Home / Florida’s Coral Reef / Organizational strategy

01 / Parent communications framework

Organizational strategy

A developed organizational communications framework connecting published conservation priorities to recurring public communications and a focused recruitment campaign.

Independent hypothetical portfolio project. Not affiliated with, commissioned by, or endorsed by the Florida Department of Environmental Protection.

Organizational context

Working within an established conservation program

This hypothetical framework explores how communications could support Florida DEP’s Coral Reef Conservation Program, with an emphasis on Southeast Florida. The published CRCP Strategic Plan 2020–2025 provides historical organizational context, particularly its Education and Outreach priorities; it is not assumed to remain the approved 2027 plan.

CRCP already has documented research, conservation, educational, stewardship, and citizen-science activities. Public examples include program resources, the Reef Ambassador Initiative, BleachWatch, and a 2024 Southeast Florida Reef Review bulletin. Proposed communications would build on and complement relevant established efforts, not presume a need to replace them.

Priorities informing the strategy

The published 2020–2025 plan identifies three Education and Outreach objectives. These are illustrative communications contributions—not additional official DEP objectives, numerical targets, or an exhaustive list of activities.

2.1

Education and awareness

Support public understanding of reef ecosystems, threats, research, and conservation activities.

2.2

Partnerships

Support informed communication and engagement with relevant stakeholders and partners.

2.3

Citizen science

Explain existing participation opportunities and help relevant audiences understand how they can contribute.

Integrated communications approach

Each proposed campaign or asset identifies a primary organizational purpose and intended audience response. Education, partner engagement, and participation can reinforce that purpose where useful, but additional goals or activities are not included simply to cover every priority. This treats the three objectives as a common foundation rather than isolated communications programs.

From evidence to communications decisions

Documented organizational goals and relevant evidence inform audience choices, intended responses, communications approaches, and how results would be assessed. Specific objectives, messages, channels, and measures are developed within the appropriate workstream or asset plan.

Audience considerations

Potential audiences include reef users, coastal communities, educators, and stakeholder or partner networks. Depending on the initiative, they may be direct audiences, intermediaries, or collaborators. Specific priorities and intended responses should be chosen for each communications purpose rather than imposing one audience hierarchy across all activities.

Connected communications workstreams

The parent framework guides two complementary strategic areas, each developed for this independent portfolio with its own audiences, intended responses, proposed activities and evaluation approach.

See the June 2027 integrated editorial calendar ↗ for an applied one-month example of how the two workstreams coordinate.

Coordination, prioritization, and learning

Ongoing communications and focused campaigns would be considered together when planning topics, timing, and distribution. Communications attention could adapt to reef conditions, scientific developments, audience needs, and emerging opportunities. Lessons from each workstream would inform broader planning without merging their distinct objectives and performance measures.

Evidence and implementation boundaries

The approach draws on public program information, relevant science, and audience research. The developed ongoing communications and BleachWatch strategy pages document audience choices, messages, formats, distribution and proposed evaluation approaches. Operational specifics and future content briefs may still require verification. Public sources do not establish DEP’s internal staffing, approvals, resources, or communications performance. No actual DEP coordination, implemented campaign, partner commitment, or achieved result is claimed.